4. Identify gaps in the innovation feasibility file
The experts then compare their diagnoses to establish a collective diagnosis measuring the shortcomings of the innovation project. These gaps are measured using a list of twenty-three indicators describing the four types of evidence in terms. Figure 4 shows the evaluation grid for the Problem Setting phase, where evidence of utility and innovation value are measured.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Management and innovation engineering
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Identify gaps in the innovation feasibility file
Bibliography
Also in our database
Bibliography
A. Hamdouch, " La dynamique d'émergence et de structuration des clusters et réseaux d'innovation : revue critique de la littérature et éléments de problématisation ", XLVe Colloque de l'ASRDLF, Rimouski, Québec, 2008
G. Le Cardinal, J.-F. Guyonnet, B. Pouzoulic, La dynamique de la confiance, Dunod, Paris, 1997
B. Yannou, B. Zimmer,...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference