Practical sheet | REF: FIC0054 V1

Conducting an authorization procedure

Author: Gérard GIRIN

Publication date: March 10, 2015, Review date: November 13, 2016 | Lire en français

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


6. Mistakes to avoid

6.1 Do not send an incomplete file

Insufficiently substantiated, it is likely to be classified as inadmissible, leading at best to a delay in the appraisal procedure, and at worst to the cancellation of the authorization order for inadequacy of the impact study (for example).

SCROLL TO TOP

6.2 Don't overlook the various bodies consulted by the prefect to give him their opinion

Even if the prefect is not obliged to follow these opinions (except for that of the CoDERST in the case of an unfavorable opinion...

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Environment

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Mistakes to avoid