Overview
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Gérard GIRIN: Environmental engineer
INTRODUCTION
You have been invited to the CoDERST meeting where you presented your observations in defense of your project. You are awaiting its response to find out whether your requests for modifications have been taken into account.
Like all the other parties involved in the authorization application procedure (DAE), CoDERST only issues an opinion, which the Prefect is not obliged to follow.
What action can you take if you have not been heard or if you feel you are unable to comply with certain requirements?
In the weeks following the CoDERST meeting, you will receive the draft prefectoral order (arrêté préfectoral - AP) ruling on your file and specifying the proposed requirements.
In concrete terms, this is the last phase of the procedure, during which you can try to have the inspector of classified installations for environmental protection (ICPE) make changes to the AP project.
To obtain satisfaction, your request must be justified.
Successive steps following a CoDERST session
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
CAN BE ALSO FOUND IN:
This article is included in
Environment manager
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Follow-up to CoDERST
Receive the draft prefectoral decree (AP)
Bibliography
Also in our database
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
