2. How should researchers be distributed and how big should teams be?
So many questions when it comes to dividing research staff into sub-units!
Here are just a few examples:
How can we prevent specialists from forging their own ivory towers?
How can we avoid the NIT "Not invented here" syndrome, where researchers are only interested in their own production and reject external contributions or challenges?
How can you have specialists at your disposal, while at the same time being able to carry out interdisciplinary work that often leads to innovation?
What is a critical mass for in-depth treatment of a subject?
How can researchers' time be managed between the need to keep their expertise up to date and directly productive tasks?
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Management and innovation engineering
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
How should researchers be distributed and how big should teams be?
Bibliography
Also in our database
Bibliography
Fabrice Devaux, La Boîte à outils du responsable R&D , Dunod, 2010
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference